advocates of LVT tend to advocate for redistributing it as UBI (within a country)
but, what if it were done on a global scale?
the arguments for LVT apply globally
(the "land" - including natural resources - was not created by people, and there is no reason why it should be monopolized by some more than others)
in practice, it's been hard enough to convince local governments to tax land more, so little thought is given to a "utopian" global LVT fantasy
nonetheless...
global LVT+UBI could diminish one of the main incentives for war (that is, the exclusive extraction of value from the conquered land)
under a global LVT+UBI, the "rent" value would already be shared with everyone
Norway would share the extraction taxes from its petroleum industry with everyone
New York would share the land value taxes from its expensive real state with everyone
one could imagine such an approach as an alternate approach for the European Union
(whose founding was largely motivated to maintain piece through market integration)
ie. "why take over X, when you are already getting a 'fair' share of X?" (vs today: nothing)
an aggressor annexing some land would gain exclusive access to its resources, but, as a result, they (/their citizens) would lose access to their UBI proceeds from the rest of the world
there would still be incentive for areas with valuable land or resource rents to "defect" or to be conquered (if the LVT-per-capita was above average)